Where is ‘Papa’s angel’ Honeypreet? Hunt intensified along Nepal border

Where is ‘Papa’s angel’ Honeypreet? Hunt intensified along Nepal border

The patrol has intensified along the Indian-Nepal border in Maharajganj and surrounding neighborhoods to make up for the foster daughter of Dera Sacha Sauda’s head, Honeypreet Insan.

Police said Wednesday that officials from central intelligence agencies and the state have camped in Maharajganj for a few days and strictly monitor movements along the border.

Honeypreet Insan was reserved for Haryana for inciting violence after the conviction of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh.

Honeypreet posters with a public call to inform the police if they noticed, were stuck on the walls along the streets and the police station in Sonauli Maharajganj near the border with Nepal.

All Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) border crossings have been targeted to ensure Honeypreet does not escape.

“They were alerted and asked to verify the identity of individuals before allowing cross-border security personnel,” SSB Deputy Inspector General Ranjeet Singh said.

A high alert has also been reported in Lakhimpur, Balrampur, Siddharthnagar, Bahraich and Shrawasti – other neighboring districts of Nepal.

UP share an open border of 599.3 km with Nepal touching seven districts – Pilibhit, Lakhimpur Kheri, Bahraich, Sravasti, Balrampur, Maharajganj and Sidhharthnagar.

Female civilian personnel were also deployed to monitor suspects and vehicles carrying goods were also checked.

“The patrol of public places like cinemas, hotels, trains and bus stations has also intensified,” said DIG.

“We are taking all precautionary measures to maintain law and order,” he said.

Haryana police had issued an observation notice for Honeypreet and teams were formed to arrest him with other defendants.

The 50-year-old Dera chief, who is in Sunaria Rohtak Prison, was sentenced to 20 years in prison by the CBI court for violating two of his disciples.

Divyanka Tripathi, Vivek Dahiya on winning Nach Baliye 8: The show has promoted our relationship by three years

Divyanka Tripathi, Vivek Dahiya on winning Nach Baliye 8: The show has promoted our relationship by three years

Divyanka Tripathi, Vivek Dahiya on winning Nach Baliye 8: The show has promoted our relationship by three years

The favorite couple on television, Divyanka Tripathi and Vivek Dahiya, have more than one reason to celebrate the victory of Nach Baliye 8. Not only has the hard work of the three months been paid out since they overcame Sanaya Irani-Mohit Sehgal and Abigail Pande-Sanam Johar at the end of the series, but the time spent during filming took the two more than ever.

In an interview with indianexpress.com, the winning couple shared their journey Nach Baliye, which had its own ups and downs, and why the show is more personal experience than a competition.

In the last three months we have been promoted for three years in our relationship because Nach Baliye really helped us to better understand each other, to spend more time with each other and there are so many things that We have learned from each other, “said the duo, whose chemistry has been wanted from the moment they stepped onto stage Nach Baliye.

In fact, it was the emergence of his strong bond that helped the couple navigate through the poor results.

In the early phase of the competition, Divyanka and Vivek were better appreciated than being synchronized with each other rather than the quality of their actions.

The pair, however, opted for their play in the later stages of the series and gave surprising and solid performance. One thing, however, remained constant was the Divyanka fan base, courtesy of his drama Yeh Hai Mohabbatein.

It is because the base of loyal supporters that people have predicted Divyanka and Vivek reach the final and could even win. But the couple, themselves, what did they expect to get away from the title?

“(We are) delighted and pleasantly surprised! We are still numb and the feeling has not increased.

We want to thank all our #Divek fans and family members who made this victory. This trip is not only ours, but they have been with us for the last three months of the afternoon, asking us to vote for them and they did! The trophy can shine in our house, but it really belongs to all our fans, without their love, their support and their vote Nach our trip would never have had such a beautiful climax “, they replied.

Russia, upping pressure on Telegram app, says it was used to plot bombing

Russia, upping pressure on Telegram app, says it was used to plot bombing

Russia, upping pressure on Telegram app, says it was used to plot bombing

Said the Russian security service FSB Monday that the terrorists had used the telegram mail application to carry out a deadly suicide attack on Russian soil, increasing pressure on the implementation of days after the authorities accused him of violation laws on the data.

Russian regulatory authority Roskomnadzor said on Friday it would soon block telegram, unless it handled the information necessary for the application in an official list of distributors to government information.

Telegram has so far refused to comply because it fears that respect compromise the privacy of its more than 6 million Russian users.

Once on the list, it would store user information on Russian servers and transmit user information to authorities upon request.

The FSB, the successor agency to the KGB of the Soviet era, has weighed down on Monday’s stagnation issuing a statement saying Telegram provides “terrorists the ability to create secret, highly encrypted chat rooms.”

He said that a suicide bomber who exploded in the St. Petersburg metro on 3 April, killing 15 people, had used Telegram to plan the attack with his accomplices and became the most commonly used telegram of his type by terrorists operating in Russia in the interior.

The intervention suggests that authorities are required to block Telegram for national security reasons, unless they meet their requirements.

Pavel Durov, founder of the telegram says that the application has blocked thousands of channels linked to terrorism and that if Russia banned terrorists would simply switch to a competing service.

“The appearance of the telegram telling information was used to prepare a terrorist act there three months raises questions,” said Dúrov in social networks Monday.

“It is sad that Russia’s intelligence services exploit this tragedy as a pretext to strengthen its influence and control over the population.”

Alexander Zharov, head of the communications regulator, said on Sunday Telegram NTV that it was only a few days to comply and Dúrov accused of being an anarchist without interest to uphold the law.

“As far as I know, Mr. Dúrov will deliver key information to the intelligence services allowing terrorists to kill people with impunity using this communication channel,” Zharov said.

The Kremlin said the last difference was only the communications regulator. If Telegram was banned, Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for President Vladimir Poutine and an end user of the telegram, said he and other officials will go to another service.

Dúrov said that the requirements of the communications regulator violate the constitutional right of the Russians to keep their correspondence secret and were technically impossible to meet.

He said telegram doing everything possible to fight against terrorism and that the block would not be useful because other encrypted services were available.

“If you want to end terrorism by blocking things, you will block the Internet,” Dúrov wrote.

It’s not about privilege, but accountability

It’s not about privilege, but accountability

It’s not about privilege, but accountability

The current stop in Karnataka between the legislature and the media reflects the “gray areas” in the functioning of Indian democracy. To be fair, we must recognize that this is not the first time these conflicts have arisen.

This may be the last. Our democracy seems more eager to present the “privileges” of focusing on “responsibilities.”

It is assumed that these privileges are enjoyed to allow one to exercise and fulfill their responsibilities for oneself.

In this controversy, both sides seem to have turned the battle into a “rights and privileges” rather than “accountability and responsibility.”

During the launch of The National Herald Benglauru, Rahul Gandhi said, “the government requires everyone to be silent,” referring to the Center. These criticisms of the position adopted by the state legislature could also argue that Gandhi’s words were not heard by his party mates.

In the same sense, we also have to ask who will “keep our guard”? What happens if the press that exists to freely and equitably articulate the different contours of the public debate, does not respect and does not respect the norms of fair play. The “fence” that can afford to eat the harvest?

The current situation of stagnation in Karnataka, where the President of the Assembly ordered the police to arrest two journalists for defaming the legislature and its members, has many facets.

First, what constitutes the “privilege” of a chosen house? Can a legislative office, by itself, prevent the press from violating the privileges and the question that must be arbitrated by an institution independent of the two? Opposition MPs have already made assumptions about the President’s motion and asked if the house wanted.

It was also reported that the House’s privilege committee would hesitate to demand the arrest of journalists. In addition, one of the complaints against journalists was presented by the President, when it was the home of a private member.

It is important to ask yourself, when you can have the “power” to take action, does not prudence encourage “to act in moderation” in relation to “the exercise of power”? We must also recognize that the media investigative journalism and the unilateral presentation of various issues leaves much to be desired.

Many reports in the media address a problem or event, either as “black” or “white,” and it is in this context that the article raised the issue of ‘keeping watch. ”

While we respect the unequivocal freedom of the press, it may be useful to think of moderation and the most powerful ombudsman means to deal with the media.
Institutions in a democracy must be respectful, do not require it. Will all the parties involved be willing to go beyond prestige and exercise greater moderation in the interest of the common good?

This does not seem likely, but it is a movement that must begin immediately, so over time, various institutions recognize and respect the role of each as the pillars of mutual democracy.

The political scientist and director of the research center for social sciences and education

Best wireless router: This is What Professionals Do while selecting it

Best wireless router: This is What Professionals Do while selecting it

There are many types of Wireless Router available in the Market as well as many Online Stores such as eBay, Flip kart, Snapdeal, Amazon and much more. People are quite reluctant to get the proper kind of Internet Wireless Router for them by which they can carry out their work in a proper way.

There are various Wireless Routers available for the Normal as well as Professional people. It is quite good to check every Router before purchasing it as there are lots of Routers which gets quickly damaged after using for some months.

One should properly buy it to complete their required task according to their requirement. So every people whether they are Professional or Non-Professional should buy High qualitative Wireless Router which provides them proper Frequency Bandwidth and Wide Range.

There are many Wireless Router Brands like Asus, Linksys and TP-Link etc. by which people get appropriate Wireless Router for them. It is impossible to find a better Wireless Router without knowing the requirement of the user.

A Wireless Router can be purchased as per the Size of the Room or any Area. A Wide Range Wireless Router can provide you Wide Frequency for a Large Room and for a Small room; it requires only a Low-Frequency Range Router.

One has to become more realistic while choosing the Best Wireless Router for them. It is possible to select Best Wireless Router when one knows about it very well.

For Normal people, it is easy to select many better Wireless Routers, but for the Professional people, it is quite difficult and confusing task to purchase accurate Wireless Router. While purchasing any Wireless Router every Professional should check the Essential things such as Frequency Bandwidth, Range of Frequency, Guest Network, IPv4 or IPv6, Usage Requirement per day, Cloud services etc.

Normal person selecting the Wireless Router

Normal people have some easy as well as difficult work to perform daily and they can perform it by using a good Wireless Router, but Professional people have to perform difficult and much work daily. So Professionals require a proper High-quality Internet connection to complete any work quickly.

It differs the use of the Wireless Router according to the work profile. Some work contains complex task and some have easy work by which every people has to buy Wireless Router according to it.

If Professionals choose a Low-quality Wireless Router, then there will be work issue and it will lead to financial loss to them. Professional people need a perfect Router for performing every work successfully.

Every Wireless Router has some issues and some advantages in it. Some Routers provides High-quality Speed but provides only Small Range Frequency. Some Routers provide Wide Range Frequency but have Low-quality Bandwidth Frequency.

So for purchasing a High-quality Bandwidth Frequency with Wide Range Frequency, you have to buy High Price Range Router which can provide you every feature. People should purchase Wireless Router according to their utilization which can fulfill their requirements.